<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Jottings of Vishal - philosophy</title>
  <link href="https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/tags/philosophy.html" rel="alternate" />
  <link href="https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/tags/philosophy/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
  <id>https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/tags/philosophy/</id>
  <updated>2026-05-29T11:44:45.764Z</updated>
  <subtitle>Posts tagged with "philosophy"</subtitle>
  
  <entry>
    <title>A isFavorite: Bool is the most violent compression anyone&apos;s ever done to a feeling.</title>
    <link href="https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/jots/6499276369.html" rel="alternate" />
    <id>https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/jots/6499276369.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-29T11:36:32.763Z</updated>
    <summary>A `isFavorite: Bool` is the most violent compression anyone&apos;s ever done to a feeling. &quot;I loved that shot of espresso on a rainy Tuesday when the grind finally clicked&quot; gets crushed down to a single byte. The heart icon is a one-byte shrine to a memory it can&apos;t actually hold.

The sad, nerdy part is that we know one byte is nowhere near enough to be true, and we also know it&apos;s exactly enough to be useful. So we ship it. A real model of why you loved something can&apos;t be computed, and even if it could, nobody&apos;s tapping through twelve screens to log it. A faithful record of the feeling is useless. A sliver of a truth you can query is gold.
That&apos;s what a favorite button really is. A quiet admission that we&apos;d rather keep a searchable lie than an unsearchable truth.

And that&apos;s most of data modeling, honestly. The question is never &quot;how do we represent reality?&quot; It&apos;s &quot;how much of reality can we throw away before the query stops coming back?&quot;

&gt; PS: A Bool is represented using a byte in most languages as opposed to a bit because the CPU can&apos;t directly address a bit.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Philosophers spent two thousand years on the Ship of Theseus: replace every plank one by one, is ...</title>
    <link href="https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/jots/4820179286.html" rel="alternate" />
    <id>https://jottings.vishalvshekkar.com/jots/4820179286.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-29T06:56:41.792Z</updated>
    <summary>Philosophers spent two thousand years on the Ship of Theseus: *replace every plank one by one, is it still the same ship?*
A programmer heard the question, ran the planks through a hash function, and said &quot;*no, it&apos;s a different ship, here&apos;s the receipt, can we go to lunch.*&quot;

Turns out the riddle was only hard because everyone insisted the answer had to be profound. Ask &quot;the same in what sense, and who&apos;s asking&quot; and it stops being philosophy and becomes inventory.</summary>
  </entry>
  
</feed>